bolt
Junior Member
Posts: 65 
|
Post by bolt on Mar 18, 2015 8:04:24 GMT
Sounds good
|
|
|
|
Post by heather on Mar 23, 2015 11:21:22 GMT
Ian has suggested keeping the 3rd war but making it a practice round. Not 100% sure about that idea as I think it sends mixed messages about participation. But interested in your feedback.
|
|
figsy
New Member
Posts: 5
|
Post by figsy on Mar 23, 2015 12:02:33 GMT
I'm not sure either about a practice war but I do know ian's thinking. The 3rd war has been an issue since we started it. I like warring as much as I can but I hope it hasn't been taking away from our original system. Our results have faltered lately and we need to get a win under our belts. I wouldn't mind personally reverting back to our 2 war strategy for a couple of weeks to see if we can get our results back on track. But I'm open either way to what we choose, wouldn't miss a war.
|
|
wolf
New Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by wolf on Mar 23, 2015 17:07:23 GMT
I feel like heading into a war with the focus other than winning is bad form. I can see the logic but cant buy into it. Just my opinion. Also I agree with Figsy on the wars....2 was more productive
|
|
ian
New Member
Posts: 19
|
3rd War
Mar 23, 2015 20:12:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by ian on Mar 23, 2015 20:12:18 GMT
I think it would help people learn new strategies....and we can pick up some xp points...participation shouldnt matter..
but i think a lot of ppl are consistently using dragons and thats useless when we come up against a clan with good airdefenses...12 ppl with the same army that only suits a handful of bases...
|
|
bolt
Junior Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by bolt on Mar 23, 2015 21:05:39 GMT
I practice every war but with intentions of winning
|
|
